If this large-scale workforce reconstruction indeed comes to pass, it’s going to change the composition of the workforce. Obviously. That’s unavoidable. But how you go about it will (literally) change what your workforce looks like, so it’s worth asking: What’s the best approach?
Revisiting what we’ve seen in the tech sector holds important clues for FP&A decision makers in this respect, especially in the context of diversity, equity and inclusion. For example, workforce restructurings within the tech space appear to be skewing in the direction of bias, and a lot of preliminary research suggests that recent rounds of layoffs at tech firms have disproportionately impacted two groups specifically, women and people of color.
In fact, there’s a lot of data to back all of this up:
Women, who in general represent only about one in three tech workers, have nonetheless accounted for nearly half (47%) of recent workforce casualties.
Meanwhile, Latino employees, who comprise a meager 11 percent of the overall IT workforce, now account for more than one in 10 of the recently terminated.
Twitter is paradigmatic in this regard, with women accounting for more than half of recent layoffs at a company where men constituted a sizable majority. (Spoiler alert: There are lawsuits pending.) For organizations now restructuring their FP&A workforces, or even simply rethinking how they’ll leverage contingent and full-time workers, however, the good news is that it’s probably not too late. Just think about what metrics matter, what outcomes you want to drive and what guardrails you’ll need to get there.
That’s the only way to avoid the kind of DEI pitfalls we’ve seen so far in tech. And at a moment when one in three companies plans to cut 30 percent of their workforces or more by year-end, it’s probably high time to take action, too.